deepdream of
          a sidewalk
Show Question
Math and science::Algebra::Aluffi

Groups. All orders divides order of maximal element

Order: divides order of maximal element

Let G be a commutative group, and let gG be an element with maximal finite order. Any other element with finite order has an order that divides |g|.

The same statement cannot be made for non-comutative groups.

Can you remember the proof?

Maximal finite order

Let g be an element of group G. g has maximal finite order iff all other elements with finite order have an order less than that of g.


Proof essence

Consider elements g and h of group G, with orders as follows:

|g|=243753|h|=243851

|h| doesn't divide |g|, as one prime is raised to a larger value. Commutativity allows us to create a new element f that has an order whose prime factors are the maximum of those from |g| and |h|. This order must be larger than |g|, so g can't have maximal order.

In comparison, if k is another element and |k|=243551, then this order divides |g|, as all primes are raised to a smaller power in |k|.

Proof

Proof.

Let g and h be elements of a group G, with g being an element of maximal finite order. Proceed by contradiction: assume that |h| does not divide |g|.

We can express |g| and |h| in terms of their prime factorization:

|g|=2a3b5c7d...|h|=2i3j5k7l...

If every prime of |h| is raised to a lower corresponding power than |g|, then |h| would divide |g|. But by assumption it does not, so there must be at least 1 prime that is raised to a higher power in |h| compared to |g|. Denote this prime by p. Focusing on this prime, we can now express |g| and |h| as so:

|g|=pmr|h|=pns

Where r and s collect the other primes.

In a controlled way, we can create elements with smaller orders than |g| and |h|. Consider first |g|. The element gm has an order that is m times smaller than |g|, |gm|=|g|m. This is so, as m is a factor of |g|. Complete this reduction by considering the element gmp, which is an element with order |gmp|=r. We have found an element whose order is |g| but with the prime p absent.

The same process can be repeated for |h|, and we now consider the element hs, which has order |hs|=pn.

When we combine these two elements into a third element, the point of this process becomes clear. The element hsgmp has an order:

|hsgmp|=rpn

As n>m, we have found an element with order larger than that of |g|.

Importance of commutativity

The proof above doesn't specifically mention where commutativity comes in. Can you spot it? Possibly surprisingly, implication requiring commutativity is the statement:

|hs|=pn|gmp|=s|hsgmp|=rpn

Check Aluffi p49 (exercise 1.14) for an explation.


Source

Aluffi p49