deepdream of
          a sidewalk
Show Question
Math and science::Algebra::Aluffi

Cosets

Coset

Let G be a group and HG a subgroup.

For any aG, a right-coset of H is any set of the form:

Ha

For any aG, a left-coset of H is any set of the form:

aH

Coset equivalence relation

A right-coset forms a block in a partition defined by an equivalence relation, R.

xRyxy1H

A left-coset forms a block in a partition defined by a equivalence relation, L.

xLyx1yH

The essence of the relations is to consider an element related to another if the inverse of one element brings the other element back to H.


The quotient group property

The equivalence relation above that defines a partition of right cosets satisfies an important property. An in fact, this property can define the equivalence relation, assuming a fixed subgroup H. This property appears on the LHS below:

(gG,xyxgyg)xy1HHa=Hb

The property also asserts that H is the equivalence class of eG.

R is a valid equivalence relation

Shown for the right coset equivalence relation,

xRyxy1H .

We can show that the above relation is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.

  • We have xx1=eH, so xx.
  • If xy, then xy1H. Observe that (xy1)1=yx1, and this element is in H, as H is closed under the group operation.
  • If xy and yz, then we have xy1H and yz1H. Concatenating through the group operation we have xy1yz1=xz1, and this term is in H, again as H is closed under the group operation.

The same line of reasoning also applies to L.

The partitions of R

A block in the partition corresponding to R can be expressed in terms of H and a single term from the class.

Proof. Let A be one of the equivalence classes. If we fix an element aA, then any element xA has the property that xa1=h, for some hH. In other words, x=ha. With x being arbitrary, this property is enough to define A: any element having this property is in A, and any element in A is \( \sim_{\text{equivalent} \) to a and has this property.

The same line of reasoning also applies to L. Thus, any subgroup H of G is associated with 2 partitions of G.

Intuition #1

The idea is to consider any element of a2Ha1 as being expressible as h2a for some h2H. We are breaking a2 into two components h2 and a1. With this, it is easy to see that h2 can be reached by a2a1.

Visualization

Alternative treatment

The material is presented in the reverse order in this intuitive post: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1128688/52454.

Intuition

Intuition for why:

(gG,xyxgyg)Ha=Hb

Consider x=eG. The equivalence class of eG maps to the subgroup H. Now consider g=a and then g=b. For g=a, we must have hH,haa. If this is not clear, note that aeGa, then apply the LHS of the implication above. Thus, all elements Ha are in an equivalence class. The same applies to Hb.

Now consider what happens if we assert that ab. As an equivalence relation is transitive, all elements Ha and Hb must also be equivalent.

A visualization of this idea is shown below.

Not that this reasoning doesn't explain why Ha includes every element equivalent to a. One must show why it's not possible for an element vG to exist and for va but vHa. To explain this, we note that va implies that va1eG, which in turn means that there exists some hH such that ha=v. Thus we have vHa.