Math and science::Algebra::Aluffi
Groups. Monomorphism equivalents.
Let
The following are equivalent:
is a monomorphism. . is injective as a set-function.
The implication from 2) to 3) reminds me of Lagrange's theorem.
Can you remember the proofs?
Proof.
- 1)
2) - Let
be a group monomorphism. Being a monomorphism, any two morphisms and can be distinguished by their composition and . Let be our , and consider the two group morphisms and (the inclusion and the trivial map respectively). Both of these maps are the same trivial map , sending every element to . As they are indistinguishable, we must have , and so must only contain . - 2)
3) -
Let
be a group homomorphism with . Let be two elements that map to the same element in . In other words, . Now consider the element "from to " by which we mean . We will refer to this element as . We have . And so . But we know that only contains , and so . And so is injective. - 3)
1) - Being injective is sufficient to be a monomorphism in caterogy
. Category places additional requirements on functions in order to qualify as morphisms, and so the ability of a set injective function to not obscure by left-composition is strong enough to not obscure by left-composition in .
Alternative proof for 2) 3)
Note that as If
Relation to Lagrange's Theorem
Having two elments from