\( \newcommand{\matr}[1] {\mathbf{#1}} \newcommand{\vertbar} {\rule[-1ex]{0.5pt}{2.5ex}} \newcommand{\horzbar} {\rule[.5ex]{2.5ex}{0.5pt}} \newcommand{\E} {\mathrm{E}} \)
deepdream of
          a sidewalk
Show Question
\( \newcommand{\cat}[1] {\mathrm{#1}} \newcommand{\catobj}[1] {\operatorname{Obj}(\mathrm{#1})} \newcommand{\cathom}[1] {\operatorname{Hom}_{\cat{#1}}} \newcommand{\multiBetaReduction}[0] {\twoheadrightarrow_{\beta}} \newcommand{\betaReduction}[0] {\rightarrow_{\beta}} \newcommand{\betaEq}[0] {=_{\beta}} \newcommand{\string}[1] {\texttt{"}\mathtt{#1}\texttt{"}} \newcommand{\symbolq}[1] {\texttt{`}\mathtt{#1}\texttt{'}} \newcommand{\groupMul}[1] { \cdot_{\small{#1}}} \newcommand{\groupAdd}[1] { +_{\small{#1}}} \newcommand{\inv}[1] {#1^{-1} } \newcommand{\bm}[1] { \boldsymbol{#1} } \require{physics} \require{ams} \require{mathtools} \)
Math and science::Analysis::Tao::09. Continuous functions on R

Uniform continuity

Continuous functions, open intervals and uniform continuity

Card 1 of 3: Uniform continuity

For a continuous function on a closed interval \( [a, b] \) we know it must be bounded; other nice properties follow. If we relax the restriction and consider a continuous function on an open interval, \( (a, b) \), we cannot imply that it is bounded, and we lose subsequence nice properties. Consider \( f: (0, 2) \to \mathbb{R} \) with \( f(x):=\frac{1}{x} \) for an illustration.

Measure of stability

We try to rebuild some new structure around functions on an open interval. The plan is to classify and distinguish continuous functions based on a measure of stability: measure the degree to which they vary over a certain sized interval of their domain.

\( \delta \)-islands of stability

For a function \( f : X \to \mathbb{R} \) to be continuous at \( x_0 \in X \), for any \( \varepsilon > 0 \) there needed to exist some \( \delta > 0 \) such that for all \(x \in (x_0 - \delta, x_0 + \delta)\) we have \( |f(x)-f(x_0)| < \varepsilon \). The \( \delta \) was free to change for both every \( \varepsilon \) and for every \( x_0 \).

Restricting \( \delta \) to be a single value for any \( x_0 \in X \) we can describe what it means for a function to be uniformly convergent over it's full domain.

Uniform continuity

Let \( X \subseteq \mathbb{R} \) be a set, and let \( f : X \to \mathbb{R} \) be a continuous function. We say that \( f \) is uniformly continuous iff for every real \( \varepsilon > 0 \), there exists a real \( \delta > 0 \) such that \( |f(x_1) - f(x_2)| < \varepsilon \) whenever \( x_1, x_2 \in X \) and \( |x_1 - x_2 | < \delta \).

Tao uses an if rather than iff relationship in his definition, but I don't see why.


Continuity vs. uniform continuity—the difference of \( \delta \)

A function \( f : X \to \mathbb{R} \) converges at \( x_0 \) on \( E \) if for every \( \varepsilon > 0 \) there exists a \( \delta > 0 \) such that for all \( x \in \{ i \in X \cap E : |i - x_0 | < \delta \} \) we have \( |f(x) - L| < \varepsilon \) for some real \( L \). \( f \) is continuous at \( x_0 \) if it converges to \( f(x_0) \) at \( x_0 \) on \( X \).

We can see that every uniformly continuous function is continuous but not the other way around.

Example

The function \( f : (0, 2) \to \mathbb{R} \) defined by \( f(x) := \frac{1}{x} \) is continuous on \( (0, 2) \), but not uniformly continuous; the dependency of \( \varepsilon \) on \( \delta \) prescribed by continuity 'becomes worse' as \( x \to 0 \).


Source

p244-246