\( \newcommand{\matr}[1] {\mathbf{#1}} \newcommand{\vertbar} {\rule[-1ex]{0.5pt}{2.5ex}} \newcommand{\horzbar} {\rule[.5ex]{2.5ex}{0.5pt}} \newcommand{\E} {\mathrm{E}} \)
deepdream of
          a sidewalk
Show Question
\( \newcommand{\cat}[1] {\mathrm{#1}} \newcommand{\catobj}[1] {\operatorname{Obj}(\mathrm{#1})} \newcommand{\cathom}[1] {\operatorname{Hom}_{\cat{#1}}} \newcommand{\multiBetaReduction}[0] {\twoheadrightarrow_{\beta}} \newcommand{\betaReduction}[0] {\rightarrow_{\beta}} \newcommand{\betaEq}[0] {=_{\beta}} \newcommand{\string}[1] {\texttt{"}\mathtt{#1}\texttt{"}} \newcommand{\symbolq}[1] {\texttt{`}\mathtt{#1}\texttt{'}} \newcommand{\groupMul}[1] { \cdot_{\small{#1}}} \newcommand{\groupAdd}[1] { +_{\small{#1}}} \newcommand{\inv}[1] {#1^{-1} } \newcommand{\bm}[1] { \boldsymbol{#1} } \require{physics} \require{ams} \require{mathtools} \)
Math and science::Topology

Finer and coarser topologies

We say that one topology \( \mathcal{T} \) on \( X \) is finer than another topology \( \mathcal{T}' \) on \( X \) iff every member of \( \mathcal{T}' \) is a member of \( \mathcal{T} \). \( \mathcal{T}' \) is said to be coarser than \( \mathcal{T} \).

Stronger and weaker are alternative terminology for finer and coarser.

\( \mathcal{T} \) is strictly finer iff \( \mathcal{T}' \) is a proper subset.

Symbolically,

  • \( \mathcal{T} \) is finer than \( \mathcal{T}' \) ⟺ \( \mathcal{T}' \subseteq \mathcal{T} \).
  • \( \mathcal{T} \) is strictly finer than \( \mathcal{T}' \) ⟺ \( \mathcal{T}' \subset \mathcal{T} \).


Lemma. A basis for every basis.

Let \( X \) be a set. Let \( \mathcal{T} \) and \( \mathcal{T}' \) be topologies on \( X \) with bases \( \mathscr{B} \) and \( \mathscr{B}' \) respectively. Then \( \mathcal{T} \) is finer than \( \mathcal{T}' \) iff

for each \( x \in X \) and each basis element \( B' \in \mathscr{B'} \) containing \( x \), there is a basis element \( B \in \mathscr{B} \) such that \( x \in B \subseteq B' \).

It should be easy to prove this. Refer to Munkres for a proof example.

By this lemma, it can be seen how a topology induced by one metric can be equivalent to a topology induced by another.

A basis for every basis: alternative perspective

I think a better way of phasing the second part of the iff relationship is to say: every \( b' \in \mathscr{B'} \) can be expressed as a union of elements \( b \in \mathscr{B} \).

Example

For a set \( X \), the discrete topology is the finest topology while the indiscrete topology is the coarsest topology.

Context